Peer-To-Peer versus SIP
P2P versus SIP - Comparison of the Protocols used in Over IP communication systems
The advantages of audio and video over IP communication, compared to traditional analog systems, are universally recognized today: one for everyone the
reduction of the costs and of the installation time that you can get thanks to the ability to share the LAN with other systems that you have already
Different systems that
share the same LAN
Where is already available a LAN, used to manage a computer network, the automation of production lines or, in the context of the security, to manage an
access control system, a video surveillance system or an anti-intrusion system, it is easy and quick to install intercom systems, emergency call systems or
public address systems by sharing the network with pre-existing services.
These systems also offer a high degree of reliability in the hardware connection of the equipment due to the ability to make redundant data networks by
simply make a ring connection of the network so that it is insensitive to interruption at any point. Another important element of evaluating the
reliability of these systems is the type of protocol used.
All available systems are based either on the adoption of a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) or on the adoption of Peer to Peer (P2P) protocols; the first
is basically the protocol used by most telephone exchanges, such as the popular Asterix, while the second is the one used in file exchange and in direct
communication between computers such as take place in Skype.
Comparison between SIP an P2P protocols
On systems using a client-server architecture based on the SIP protocol, in order to state the connection between two apparatuses it is necessary to have
management server on which all individual users (clients) must be registered; the server mainly deals with managing the connection between the different
clients: the connection request is addressed by the device making the call directly to the server and then the server connects it to the device destined
to receive the call by starting the communication between the two clients.
All in all, it is only the SIP server that is aware of the complete architecture of the system and, consequently, it is only thanks to the server that it
is possible to establish the connection between two devices. It thus is obvious that the server represents a critical element in the overall architecture
so much so that in highly reliable systems (such as emergency call systems), the adoption of a redundant server is often required.
To overcome this disadvantage, it is possible to use systems with a server-less structure based on P2P communication protocols (literally "from equal to
equal") where each device, called Peer, has the ability to connect directly to the device with Which must communicate without the intervention of any
intermediate device such as the server.
In these systems, the mapping of the addresses of all the apparatuses that make up the system is stored on board of each device and therefore each device
can directly and independently manage the connection with any other unit of the system.
It appears immediately and evident as a P2P system offers important benefits such as easy scalability (to add a new device it is enough to have a free IP
address on the network and no server capacity expansions are required) and high reliability as it is not present No element (server) whose malfunction can
affect the efficiency of the communication system.
Ultimately, while the SIP is a system with "grouped intelligence", the P2P is a system with "distributed intelligence" and therefore less subject to
malfunctions due to the failure of a single critical unit.
The diagram on the left shows an emergency
call and public address system on a multi-storey building such as a parking lot.
By using the P2P, you will not have to intervene on the server that manages the network, but it will be enough to use only the switches by sharing them
with other systems installed on the same network even if the are managed by the server.
The lack of the server does not avoid the possibility to adopts solutions, such as the ring closure of the LAN, in order to make the network insensitive
to a single cut or the ability to connect the system to a remote control room via WAN.
If you need more information fill the form that you find HERE !
Follow us on:
ERMES ELETTRONICA s.r.l. - Via Treviso, 36 - 31020 SAN VENDEMIANO - ITALY
Phone +39 0438 308470 - Fax +39 0438 492340 - email: